Holdover Rent or Illegal Penalty? California Appellate Court Sides with Commercial Landlord
Updated: Jan 23, 2021
Court upholds enforceability of holdover rent provisions in commercial leases.
In Constellation-F, LLC v. World Trading 23, Inc., (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 22, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, upheld a holdover rent provision in a commercial lease. The Court found that the holdover provision calling for a 150% rent increase was a “graduated rental” and, absent coercion, was enforceable. In doing so, the Court rejected Tenant’s claim that the holdover rent was an illegal penalty under California Civil Code Section 1671. The Constellation-F, LLC case provides new guidance regarding the enforceability of holdover rent provisions in commercial leases. Commercial landlords and tenants should pay close attention to it in drafting holdover provisions, or in prosecuting or defending holdover rent claims.
This article provides only general information, and not legal advice. If you have any questions or if we can help evaluate on how the Constellation-F, LLC case applies to you, please reach out to us at info@mcc-lawyers.com.
Recent Posts
See AllFavila v. Pasquarella (2021) 65 Cal.App.5th 934 In Favila, the Plaintiffs obtained a judgment against a Corporate Defendant; however, in a summary judgement motion, their claims against an Individual
Jolie v. Superior Court (2021) 66 Cal.App.5th 1025 While the marriage of Angelina Jolie and Brad Bitt has since ended, their divorce continues to make headlines. A temporary judge was appointed in 201
Hill RHF Housing Partners, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles (2021) 12 Cal.5th 458 Daneshmand v. City of San Juan Capistrano (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 923 [Fybel, Aronson, and Goethals] In Daneshmand, the Plain